Peter M. Groen / FlashMQ

Commit e3a794e482f3a083c8c7a045782ce0e946913a6f

Authored by Wiebe Cazemier
1 parent 0cc6610a

Fix incorrect assert about QoS on wrong object 

Fixes assertion error in debug only.
Inline Side-by-side
Showing 2 changed files with 35 additions and 3 deletions
FlashMQTests/tst_maintests.cpp
  View file @e3a794e
... ... @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ private slots:
131 131 void testIncomingTopicAlias();
132 132 void testOutgoingTopicAlias();
133 133  
  134 + void testReceivingRetainedMessageWithQoS();
  135 +
134 136 };
135 137  
136 138 MainTests::MainTests()
... ... @@ -1706,6 +1708,34 @@ void MainTests::testOutgoingTopicAlias()
1706 1708 });
1707 1709 }
1708 1710  
  1711 +void MainTests::testReceivingRetainedMessageWithQoS()
  1712 +{
  1713 + FlashMQTestClient sender;
  1714 + sender.start();
  1715 +
  1716 + const std::string payload = "We are testing";
  1717 +
  1718 + sender.connectClient(ProtocolVersion::Mqtt311);
  1719 +
  1720 + Publish p1("topic1/FOOBAR", payload, 1);
  1721 + p1.retain = true;
  1722 + sender.publish(p1);
  1723 +
  1724 + FlashMQTestClient receiver;
  1725 + receiver.start();
  1726 + receiver.connectClient(ProtocolVersion::Mqtt5);
  1727 +
  1728 + receiver.subscribe("+/+", 1);
  1729 +
  1730 + receiver.waitForMessageCount(1);
  1731 +
  1732 + MYCASTCOMPARE(receiver.receivedPublishes.size(), 1);
  1733 + MYCASTCOMPARE(receiver.receivedPublishes.front().getQos(), 1);
  1734 + MYCASTCOMPARE(receiver.receivedPublishes.front().getTopic(), "topic1/FOOBAR");
  1735 + MYCASTCOMPARE(receiver.receivedPublishes.front().getPayloadCopy(), payload);
  1736 + MYCASTCOMPARE(receiver.receivedPublishes.front().getRetain(), true);
  1737 +}
  1738 +
1709 1739  
1710 1740 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
1711 1741 {
... ...
publishcopyfactory.cpp
  View file @e3a794e
... ... @@ -95,16 +95,18 @@ bool PublishCopyFactory::getRetain() const
95 95  
96 96 Publish PublishCopyFactory::getNewPublish() const
97 97 {
98   - assert(packet->getQos() > 0);
99   - assert(orgQos > 0); // We only need to construct new publishes for QoS. If you're doing it elsewhere, it's a bug.
100   -
101 98 if (packet)
102 99 {
  100 + assert(packet->getQos() > 0);
  101 + assert(orgQos > 0); // We only need to construct new publishes for QoS. If you're doing it elsewhere, it's a bug.
  102 +
103 103 Publish p(packet->getPublishData());
104 104 p.qos = orgQos;
105 105 return p;
106 106 }
107 107  
  108 + assert(publish->qos > 0); // Same check as above, but then for Publish objects.
  109 +
108 110 Publish p(*publish);
109 111 p.qos = orgQos;
110 112 return p;
... ...