Commit 8acb79fc5ecde0ca8a06e9cbcd628f8672d00417
1 parent
1faa2150
Remove notes on safe QPDFObjectHandle -- not worth doing
The impact on the code would be extremely high, and using it would
clutter the code greatly because it would break chaining like
a.getKey("/B").getKey("/C"). There are better ways to deal with the
issue.
Showing
1 changed file
with
0 additions
and
56 deletions
TODO
| ... | ... | @@ -4,62 +4,6 @@ Documentation |
| 4 | 4 | * See #530 -- add an appendix explaining PDF encryption in general |
| 5 | 5 | plus how it's handled by qpdf. |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | -Safer QPDFObjectHandle | |
| 8 | -====================== | |
| 9 | - | |
| 10 | -Consider one of the following or something similar to make it possible | |
| 11 | -to completely eliminate warnings from treating objects of one type as | |
| 12 | -objects of a different type. | |
| 13 | - | |
| 14 | -Modeled after rust's Option type: | |
| 15 | - | |
| 16 | -``` | |
| 17 | -QPDFSafeObjectHandle soh = getObjectFromSomewhere(); | |
| 18 | - | |
| 19 | -// QPDFSafeObjectHandle would be just like QPDFObjectHandle except | |
| 20 | -// none of the type-specific methods would be there. | |
| 21 | -QPDFDictionaryHandle dh = soh.asDictionary(); | |
| 22 | -if (dh.isValid()) { | |
| 23 | - QPDFSafeObjectHandle value = dh.value().getKey("/Key"); | |
| 24 | -} | |
| 25 | -``` | |
| 26 | - | |
| 27 | -More like typescript's narrowing: | |
| 28 | - | |
| 29 | -``` | |
| 30 | -QPDFSafeObjectHandle soh = getObjectFromSomewhere(); | |
| 31 | -QPDFSafeObjectHandle value = soh.getKey("/Key"); | |
| 32 | -``` | |
| 33 | - | |
| 34 | -this would raise `std::logic_error` even if soh was a dictionary. But this would work: | |
| 35 | - | |
| 36 | -``` | |
| 37 | -QPDFSafeObjectHandle soh = getObjectFromSomewhere(); | |
| 38 | -if (soh.isDictionary()) { | |
| 39 | - QPDFSafeObjectHandle value = soh.getKey("/Key"); | |
| 40 | -} | |
| 41 | -``` | |
| 42 | - | |
| 43 | -In safe mode, we would have checkers (like we do now) but we would | |
| 44 | -track whether a specific checker had been called and throw a | |
| 45 | -`std::logic_error` if we call a type-specific method without first | |
| 46 | -calling a checker. This means that code that passes the happy path | |
| 47 | -still has to always do type checks, and this should completely | |
| 48 | -eliminate type mismatch warnings. | |
| 49 | - | |
| 50 | -Migrating existing code to use this safe version would just be a | |
| 51 | -matter of changing all occurrences of `QPDFObjectHandle` to | |
| 52 | -`QPDFSafeObjectHandle` and making sure you had test coverage on every | |
| 53 | -accessor/mutator method call. If you did and the code worked for the | |
| 54 | -happy path, then you would be assured of never getting a warning about | |
| 55 | -the a method called on an object of the wrong type. | |
| 56 | - | |
| 57 | -Implementation idea: maybe make a QPDFObjectHandleInternal<bool safe> | |
| 58 | -template with QPDFObjectHandle as QPDFObjectHandleInternal<false> and | |
| 59 | -QPDFSafeObjectHandle as QPDFObjectHandle<true>. We could then | |
| 60 | -potentially specialize certain methods to reduce the overhead and code | |
| 61 | -duplication without causing a change to the behavior of any existing | |
| 62 | -code. | |
| 63 | 7 | |
| 64 | 8 | Document-level work |
| 65 | 9 | =================== | ... | ... |